Divergent: A Minimal Effort Movie Review
So I ducked out on some responsibilities yesterday and went to the movies. My choices boiled down to watching a movie about a loving deity who murders almost everyone on the planet, an art film about Voldemort as a concierge, and Divergent.
Now I'm a sucker for young adult dystopian fiction, primarily because I want to know what kind of crap is being shoveled into the heads of the people who'll be running the country while my generation is busy changing lanes without looking in our oversized cars and bankrupting Social Security to eek out a few more minutes on the planet.
And based on my detailed assessment, ladies and gentlemen of Generation X, we're fucked.
But, there's a bit of a silver lining; at least some of these kids will be unable to defend themselves against our canes and walkers and electric scooters. Why? Because the representation of Martial Arts, at least in Divergent, is ridiculous.
The foundation of the fighting style demonstrated in Divergent
Why do some Science Fiction writers feel the need to reinvent fighting? I could almost understand if the plot revolved around 3-legged creatures, or a sentient squid who discovers an ancient manuscript of lost rubber-based fighting techniques by a creature named Bravo.
Unarmed fighting between humans isn't like technology; it's one of the few things we actually do well, and have been doing consistently since we were flinging **** at each other from the trees. You, as a Science Fiction author, might be able to predict a new way for people to get across the universe, or develop mind powers, or shoot brain-eating nanobots out of their eyes.
But you're not going to create a new way for people to punch, any more than you're going to come up with a new way for them to ****, or *****. We may not be good at much else as a species, but we've got this stuff down.
Anbo-jyutsu, the ultimate evolution in martial arts
As far as the rest of the movie goes, if you can get past Budget Katniss and Duckface #4, it's okay. Not $10 okay though.
Total Comments 53
3/30/2014 10:05am, #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Southeast WI
3/30/2014 10:11am, #3
I disagree. The best use of Science Fiction is as a means to tell stories about our own humanity, in a different context, so we can understand ourselves better. So it goes back to the point about fighting, fucking, etc.
If two humans are punching and kicking each other, without any external technology changing how that's done, it's going to be done the exact same way we've been doing it for thousands of years, regardless of whether we're on a desert planet or in zombie-infested Georgia.
3/30/2014 10:19am, #4
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Southeast WI
First of all, I think a lot of sci-fi is just supposed to be a fun ride. Moreover, even if what the author "really means" is important (and I'm not convinced it is), I don't think unrealistic fighting gets in the way of that message unless the message is specifically about fighting.
3/30/2014 10:37am, #5
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
The actual methods of combat don't need to be realistic in order to tell stories about our own humanity any more than sci fi authors need an in depth understanding of technology or space travel, or biology in order to tell a story about aliens in space using lasers. So long as the human response to it is told correct, it doesn't matter if the martial art (or piece of technology, or alien entity) itself is completely unrealistic (at least from the perspective of telling a story about our own humanity), which is why Dr Who's sonic screwdriver can do whatever they want it to do at the time, but it doesn't really matter because it's the characters that are the story.
3/30/2014 10:37am, #6
You just say that because of the Star Wars/Trekkie bullshit churned out by Hollywood to make profit off dumb people.
Good SciFi rarely gets made into movies because the average moviegoer is too stupid to get the plot. Hell, the pilot episode of the original Star Trek was branded "too smart", dumped and replaced to turn the show into a 'wagon train to the stars'.
Maybe when they make Asimov's Foundation series into a film or show, or do a non-brain injury version of Dune, I'll change my view on this.
Until then, pop scifi is the same as pop music; created primarily to separate teenagers from their parents' money.
Posted via Bullshido Android app.
3/30/2014 10:46am, #7
I realize it's not The Hangover school of comedy so popular with the kids these days, but my family enjoyed it. Plus, Kermit's doppelganger, Constantine, practices karate and proves himself to be an expert during his daring prison break. Although, apparently he's not as accomplished as Miss Piggy... But I don't want to give anything away.
But, I'm a little surprised that you are shocked that people are trying to devise new ways to fight. You have a whole sub-forum devoted to frauds and charlatans who are dreaming up new fighting styles in the real world; and generally these styles are just as useless as these fictional styles.
BTW, if you're ever interested, Wikipedia maintains a whole list of Fictional Martial Arts.
Oh, and while Star Trek's Anbo-Jitsu is quite the head-scratcher, I was really more disgusted by the Klingon Mok'bara fighting system, which was based on Tai Chi. I find Tai Chi incongruous with everything else we've ever seen regarding Klingon culture. I expect Klingons to fight with something far more brutal and direct, like Muay Thai , and use FMA-like weapons techniques.
3/30/2014 11:02am, #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
Because something is set an a futuristic, historical or fantastical setting it still needs to be credible. All aspects need to sustain this credibility. I too find it irritating when movie makers try to make things more interesting by mixing it up, making historical fighting styles cooler, or trying to invent "better" ways that will be used in the future.
The problem with most of these additions is they are designed by people who don't know enough about the subject, and/or with the goal of making it look cool.
3/30/2014 11:29am, #9
3/30/2014 12:37pm, #10