If we look at those who lawfully own fully automatic weapons, you'll see that they're some of the most law-abiding people you'll ever find. If anything, out of that entire group of those who lawfully own / owned fully automatic weapons, there has only been a single incident, where someone used a NFA authorized weapon, to commit a crime. That single incident was where a rogue police officer used such a weapon. Even if he had not owned such a weapon, he could have easily used his duty weapons instead.
Possibly, but even if they ran out of ammo, they could simply use one of their other weapons, such as the shotguns or that silly TEC9 pistol.Quote:
If a nihilistic girly-man pansy, like the Columbine Kids, or that Virginia Tech guy, wanted to go on a shooting rampage and then kill themselves before the SWAT team arrived, and they hypothetically had full auto fire modes on their weapons instead of only semi-auto, would that make them miss a lot more than they would using semi-auto mode, and would that make them run out of ammunition really, really quickly?
In the end, it was actually better that the Columbine kids resorted to using firearms, since they had placed a large number of propane bombs in the school cafeteria, with boxes of nails attached. The explosion from those alone, could have made the Bath massacre look small in comparison.
It shouldn't be that big of a deal, seeing how it really isn't a big deal amongst those who lawfully own such weapons.Quote:
"Should" full auto really be the big legal deal that it currently is in the United States, or is it only the icing on the cake?
As for those who illegally own such weapons, well, that's a different story, indeed...