Okay, you do not understand what constitutes a logical fallacy cool.
Originally Posted by Keslet
Yep, now I am 100% sure you didn't understand my post.
No "dissertation", no "semantic word games". My meaning has been clear from post to post to post. Check my comments to Goodlun. He can't say the same.
Nope. I said it was worded poorly, I have said nothing about whether I agree or disagree with what you are attempting to address.
You don't agree with my argument? Fine. You've got serious feedback on the structure? Love to hear it.
Nope, you do not understand the post. I explained it you do not get it.
You are wrong about the "complaining about tone" issue, just flat out. You said it, then said you didn't and dared me to find it, so I quoted it for you.
Yep, this went over your head. For someone who keeps harping on snarkiness, you sure do miss it when it is directed at you. Basically, I insulted your profession and mine. Like I said, you do not get my post.
Can you give me specific examples of me "psychobabbling" or playing "semantic word games" in the posts in question?
Oh I can, quite easily, but like you "I don't like to be challenged." So, it will be:
If you can't, that's a hell of a lot of misplaced and/or inaccurate rhetoric for a few short posts.
YOU: Nuh unh.
Iif: Uh huh.
You: Nuh unh.
Oh LOL@Rhetoric. Everyone, including you is using it right now.
Out before "I am a Psychologist, this was all a test" post.