you never said these things and I never insinuated that you did. stop being so dramatic.
Originally Posted by Mr. Machette
There's no reason too as I never called you out, specifically, or made an accusation against you personally. again stop being dramatic. This thread is not about you.
Find that quote in this or any other thread. It should be easy, you can search my post history through my profile.
yeah, I know. that was never in contest.
I gurantee you it isn't there.
I acknowledge that perhaps my original post should have included a brief discussion on '46, XY' assignments and the related. I did not think at the time it was warranted.
You confuse someone pointing out a minor flaw in your original (unedited) argument with full on trans-phobia.
I also was never confused by your posts, or any others, as being or depicting 'transphobia'. I never insinuated anyone on this board or otherwise is transphobic. I am not passive aggressive and if I thought you were being transphobic, I would have said as much.
As a said before, if one wants to be semantic and refer to the transgender person with their genetic sex classification rather than their gender identification, then one is not 'transphobic', one is a douche-bag and/or a tool. Further, re-read my post and that specific comment within said post; I started that paragraph with "However, in MY personal opinion...", as such, the commentary regarding douche bags and tools can be discarded by the audience at will since it's only an opinion.
I see what you did there.
That makes you the "douche bag" here, douche bag.
I completely agree with you.
Fox is free to be who Fox is IMHO. It's the dishonesty I take issue with. Though I do understand the social pressure she is under to keep here medical history secret.
Again, we agree.
If we lived in a world where everyone is as excepting as you and I, she would not be subject to such prejudice. It makes me kind of sad that she felt she hdd to lie in the first place and I know why she did it. (It's the same reson this discussion has been brought up and the very issue that is upseting you.) That, however only explains the ruse. It does not excuse it.
Though I must say I am not upset. Chemists do not become upset. I curse because I use bad language from time to time; please don't mistake that for emotion. Also, like I have previously said in this thread, I agree with, or at least acknowledge, Fallon's life choice but I am on the fence regarding her allowance in MMA competition. I am not educated enough on the subject to make a yea or nay call and I never have stated that I am (my apologies if I came across as some expert). From the sources I have, the science tells me she is good to go to fight females but another side of me disregards that information and still thinks something is not right about it. Hence, why I stated earlier, "I would not fight her in a MMA match and I would be fairly butthurt if I came upon her in a grappling tournament". I acknowledge there is a logical discrepancy in that line of thinking and I am still trying to understand my current duality.
you're probably right.
FWIW, I think Mitrione is an effing moronic ape for saying what he said in public. JMHO.