I'm always lurking by way of the email updates... but finally I am not at work, physically, and thus unlimited by ridiculous firewalls! YAY!
I'd like to help with this investigation. I have strong skills in public records research, including real estate, corporate records and civil litigation.
I'm currently working part time as a journalist and legal secretary.
I have some free time to do this right about now.
I will accept tasking PM's and/or emails from bullshido STAFF. If any STAFF members need to call me JNP has my number.
Major victory. Lloydirvinrapetruth.com is finally showing up on the first page when searching for Lloyd's name. Only question now is if the hosts will stand up to the legal pressure he brings.
I just want to get some clarification. I am looking at a bjj school near me in Maryland and found a very attractive school called crazy88. I heard that the affiliate program is terminated but at the same time they still seem to rep lloyd Irvin. any information as I don't feel comfortable associating with this and would rather find another school even if more expensive and not as successful.
Hey guys, an update on this case, couldn't find the original thread:
Write up from the Bloody Elbow - http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/10/2...ultz-rape-case
Georgette's Blog piece as well I'm currently reading - http://georgetteoden.blogspot.com.au...ll-counts.html
Apparently one of the defendants was completely acquitted of all charges, and one charge is still being deliberated by the jury in regards to the second defendant.
I haven't seen the tape, I will never see the tape, but unless the prosecutor is remarkably dense or inept, I would normally believe that it showed some sort of sexual battery occurring or they would have not brought charges.
The defense must have presented some sort of alternative narrative as to what was occuring on film and the jury must have accepted it.
I read the transcript, it was really fucked up. If you have the stomach, you can find it online still, I think it was officially published.
Originally Posted by Sam Browning
Also, this kind of makes me sick, but, Matthew Maldanado Found NOT GUILTY -
"Much of the alleged incident was caught on surveillance video inside of a parking garage next to St. Matthews Catholic Church in Northwest. The tape, which was shown in court, was graphic. But Maldonado's attorneys argued the woman voluntarily accompanied the men and the sex was consensual."
Geez, from the descriptions of the evidence it sure sounded like they were dead to rights.
Juries do unexpected t hings. That is one reason that people who are guilty in reality go to jury trial, to take that chance that the jury cannot reach a unanimous verdict of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (in criminal cases). If one person on the jury buys the defense story, and has reasonable doubt, pfft, not guilty.
The guy must have had a pretty good defense team.