No, my claim is that all of them managed it at landing speeds, and that only their instructor managed it at max cruising speed, and only after several times. If you think Mr Govatos is misreporting this exercise, I suggest you contact him and raise your concerns http://www.linkedin.com/pub/j-dan-govatos/9/780/779
Originally Posted by Rivington
So... what... you quoted him responding to someone else and expected me to know it wasn't you responding to me?
Do you have any idea of what I am saying? You do realize that I was quoting, with a link, a comment Bursill made about Crash Logic in his simulator test, right?
Wrong about what exactly? You link to one video, make no argument of your own, and then it's on to the insults. We're going to have to check the calculation made in that video first.
Ah, I see, you're not at all paying attention, despite the fact that you say you wish you'd be wrong about 9/11. Don't worry-you are wrong about 9/11. Again, that was a linked quote, not my comment. The idea with a link is that you're to click on it. But you're too busy playing Wikipedia Brown and The Smartest Guy on Bullshido to read.
And you think it wasn't a fair question on my part? It's the OBVIOUS question, and they were right to ask.
The point is that people have already tried to suggest to Bursill that he must have had Crash Logic off, and he says no, it was on.
Dude, you are so lost. I don't think anything about them at all, beyond that I expect that their official video represents their beliefs on the matter.
I said intra-"truther", not intra-Pilots for 9/11. It's funny that you think the Pilots are just disinterested parties looking for the truth, rather than committed ideologues ginning up evidence.
You seriously believe that I invented flight-hours as the standard measure for experience in pilots? It's in the conversation because it was mentioned several times in the second video.
PS: I am also amused that your "hours of training" hang-up has migrated from the world of martial arts to here, as has your "We don't have sufficient evidence, so we must draw conclusions based on flimsy analogies and inapt comparisons!" hang-up.