You have been asked to offer quotes backing up your critical position of my posts here, and you have not done so. Why? Could it be that you've been reading hastily and letting yourself get angry at phantoms?
Originally Posted by ChuckWepner
What you are is ignorant of the context surrounding the issues being hashed out in this thread. This has been going on for a long time, and I have been fighting for what I think is important for this site that whole time. Of course I am emotionally invested in it. That does not make me wrong.
You are the one whose emotions are out of control. I have no emotional stake in this whatever. I just find your conduct morally repugnant and profoundly irrational.
Dude, I have been published under the scrutiny of the same peer-review system I presume you have; I am significantly more rational that the average person.
You may have a PhD in Philosophy, but you can't read for ****. Maybe something about the glowing screen? I never asked Admin for clearance on any Portuguese anything. Read it again, and then STFU for real this time.
You specifically announced in the thread that you had gotten authorization for your Portuguese "joke" name from Phrost. Claiming otherwise is at best an attempt at prevarication.
No, it's not. Inspection of my posting history will reveal that I am very precise about my use of caps, right down to agonizing over whether or not to use "idea" or "Idea" in a sentence.
The caps / no caps issue is bullshit.
Hahahahahahaha! Bro, just because you don't know enough to spot the joke doesn't mean anyone is going to think that's a real style. At worst, they're going to go to spend 20 seconds going to Google translate before they roll their eyes.
Many members don't have their style names in caps. And capitalization conventions vary from language to language as well, so readers who don't know Portuguese may well think the non-capitalization is characteristic of the language. To any non-Portuguese-reading member, your style field is easily mistaken, as you well know, for a martial arts style name.
In one sentence you criticize me for continuing to post while not training, after I state publicly that non-posters like myself are better off not posting. And now here you are assuming I am trying to conceal the information in red above. And I'M supposed to be the intellectually dishonest party here.
Called me a liar; you should prove it. You're a Philosopher, you know what a proof it.
To pretend otherwise is just to be a dishonest douchebag again.
I say this without any malice or hostility: I am in Chicago at least once a month for work and/or to see my girlfriend. I will gladly grapple with you or any qualified party you choose to provide, and assess whether or not my ability matches exactly what is reflected in my training log.
617-599-8639. That's my cell. Use it or STFU.
Call me a liar one more time you fuckin douche.
Projection, maybe? We can help you with that.
You embody a sad little instance of bullshido wrapped in smug, sanctimonious hypocrisy. I feel sorry for you.
Yes. And that's how it's done: level charges, fail to produce evidence, run away. You clearly made your point.
As exciting as it is to mince words with you and see you try to cover your hypocrisy with sophistry and dissimulation, since anyone who looks through the thread can see you being a hypocrite again and again, that's all I have to say for now.