The evidence I see from the documents is that two judges in two separate cases decided that Mr. Vunak should be restrained from contact with Mr. Sabharwal and Mr. Garringer because he posed a credible threat of violence to them and/or was stalking them.
Vunak for whatever reason decided not to show up and defend himself at either hearing. I would love to hear his explaination for why he did not present his side of the story to either court. Note: Vunak was served, he knew about these hearings.
Vunak has also had a history of deciding to "hire" on various managers. One was a former navy officer with whom he later had a bad split. Question for Vunak: Why do you keep handing over your business affairs to others?
But I'm having trouble figuring out why Garringer deserved the harrassment that Vunak sent his way when he did not appear to have any control over the website and Vunak's business and says he didn't want to take sides in the Sabharwal / Vunak dispute.