Yes, and sometimes you miss this.
Originally Posted by Conde Koma
See this is why you get **** from Der and me on some occasions. It is not COMPLETELY DEVOID of decent scenes. You just don't like what you see and that is fine. Some of your reviews come off as rants against a genre and others don't. Again there is nothing wrong with that but, you are going to get people that disagree.
The Warrior's Way has none of this. Geochilmaru has none of this. Never Surrender has none of this. Obviously, it's very difficult to make a film that is COMPLETELY devoid of decent scenes (The Room, maybe), so every movie has at least something mildly amusing in it. But some films are so imbalanced that at the bottom line, it's not worth your ticket money, in my honest opinion.
If you can't handle that, start your own website and disable comments. This one and geo read to me as disappointed rants.
Thenn faster reads like you broke it down with no animosity.
This also depends on how you took the film and one of the problems I have with most critics and reviewers. I do it myself at times and hold movies to a standard that is evolving. I enjoyed it because it was an update of a very old drama. It could have been done better but, it fits with the imagery.
Maybe you'll watch Warrior's Way and be totally sold on just the fact that it's ninjas fighting cowboys. More power to you. But as I said in my original review, there's terrible visuals, a boring story, and NO ACTION FOR THE FIRST HALF OF THE FILM. Like, none. I was prepared to forgive Mr. Lee if there was something to keep me entertained during the first two acts, but there was really nothing. And even when the action got started, it's lazy and boring to watch.
Don't be a hypocrite by saying "I want discussion only on my terms" it makes you sound like rabbit.
What I don't want is some person just saying I didn't give the film a fair shake and then never defend the movie itself or counter the points I made. If you're going to talk ****, you should at least be willing to step into the ring.