PDA

View Full Version : MartialTalk.com - Douchebag of the Month - September 2009








Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17

Kaith Rustaz
9/29/2009 12:46pm,
You really are obsessed you know that Paul? I find that rather sad, and pathetic. I mean, you crawled out from under your rock to come here and harass me. I left Topica because I was done with it all, oh, years ago. Whatever you post, is old news, pre 2007. But go ahead. You won't be happy otherwise. But wouldn't it be better to just post links to the entire discussion so they can read it all? Without anyone wondering if you might have maybe "edited" anything? Or, will you be "picking and choosing" what information to present, so you look like a hero?

tgace
9/29/2009 12:49pm,
I think the stuff is archived Bob so I don't think it's "linkable".

Beyond that (like we discussed) this is between the two of ya'll.

Kaith Rustaz
9/29/2009 12:49pm,
I hope you two actually manage to resolve something. That would be a first in the history of this ****.
Tom, I doubt it. Paul's obsessed with this crap that most others have moved on from years ago. He won't rest until he's built his case and buried me and got a bunch of anonymous cowards to pile on even more. I suppose it gives him and them satisfaction, but the pettiness of it all is rather pathetic.

Kaith Rustaz
9/29/2009 12:51pm,
I think the stuff is archived Bob so I don't think it's "linkable".

Beyond that (like we discussed) this is between the two of ya'll.
Yep. I've got no issue with most of the folks I used to argue with. This is a Paul issue, one he wants to argue in public, dusty dead horse beating n all.

Kaith Rustaz
9/29/2009 1:14pm,
This has been loads of fun, really. I am truly tickled by this award, and want to thank Phrost for the resulting membership, content and traffic boost it's given us. Our critics heads are stone however, and continuing to try to reach them is an exercise in futility. MartialTalk . com welcomes any and all who can contribute in a mature and adult fashion, and rejects those who cannot, or who come to disrupt or push their personal agenda's. You are welcome to try us for yourselves.

Otherwise, I'll again bow out of this, and let Paul have the thread to himself to pursue his personal obsession and for others to pile on and enjoy.

In parting, to the members here who put in the time, effort and often cash to do serious investigative work, who take this seriously and who truly mean well and want to see things improve, let me say this with all sincerity: Thank you. For our differences of opinion, and method, and all in-thread bs aside, thank you for your efforts and the positive effects that you've often had.

Peace.

Cy Q. Faunce
9/29/2009 1:26pm,
Does anyone know of a preferred format for sharing such info on BS? Are screen shots preferred or is just text excerpts acceptable? I can do either.
Links are best, but screenshots are okay.

Cy Q. Faunce
9/29/2009 1:28pm,
I think the stuff is archived Bob so I don't think it's "linkable".
Why would an archive not be linkable?

tgace
9/29/2009 1:30pm,
Why would an archive not be linkable?

It's no secret that I am a friend of Paul's...from what I know the data is on a closed archive of a Topica account. The owner has the archives "offline" so you cant "link" to the archived posts w/o password access.

I could be wrong.

Cy Q. Faunce
9/29/2009 1:37pm,
Well, screenshots are fine then.

loki09789
9/29/2009 2:16pm,
Well, screenshots are fine then.

Tom's right.

The discussions that I am referencing are on a Topica discussion board that was shut down so that the Admin could start a different one. So, though I will work with him to access the posts I need to verify my statements concerning the sparring match that never was, any links would be dead.

Screenshots it is then.

loki09789
9/29/2009 2:29pm,
You really are obsessed you know that Paul? I find that rather sad, and pathetic. I mean, you crawled out from under your rock to come here and harass me. I left Topica because I was done with it all, oh, years ago. Whatever you post, is old news, pre 2007. But go ahead. You won't be happy otherwise. But wouldn't it be better to just post links to the entire discussion so they can read it all? Without anyone wondering if you might have maybe "edited" anything? Or, will you be "picking and choosing" what information to present, so you look like a hero?

1. You mention legal precedence, fair use and so one so I would think that you would understand that showing a long standing history of 'past practice' is a form of substantiation when taking a stance on an issue IF there is evidence that what was is still what is... and the whole Matt Morton thing is a current example of all of the stuff going on (not to mention your posts here too).

2. I came over here because I have first hand knowledge concerning the fraud harboring, unfair, and Bullshido-esque practices that have gone on over on MT. Again, in a legal sense it's about the same as getting a whole bunch of ppl to form a class action suite. You seem to be the mouth of all things MT here, so deal with the fact that you are going to be taking the heat.

3. You didn't have the intestinal fortitude to be straight with me (on the phone) back when we were suppose to spar. You declined from just working out with me as a sign of moving forward past all the political stuff. Then you extended a gesture to meet socially that you never meant. You are the one who is questioning my 'honor.' I'm setting the record straight as best I can.

4. I will post relevant discussion samples in order to verify the statements I made. You are free to challenge the information once it is posted. But you better be able to match or beat the verasity of the information.

Bob, I was asked to provide support to previous statements I made. I'm following up on that. If I didn't do that, you'd have something to point at as a flaw in my argument and you would be right. I'm just playing by the rules here.

loki09789
9/29/2009 2:31pm,
Isn't this about the third or fourth time you've been leaving?


This has been loads of fun, really. I am truly tickled by this award, and want to thank Phrost for the resulting membership, content and traffic boost it's given us. Our critics heads are stone however, and continuing to try to reach them is an exercise in futility. MartialTalk . com welcomes any and all who can contribute in a mature and adult fashion, and rejects those who cannot, or who come to disrupt or push their personal agenda's. You are welcome to try us for yourselves.

Otherwise, I'll again bow out of this, and let Paul have the thread to himself to pursue his personal obsession and for others to pile on and enjoy.

In parting, to the members here who put in the time, effort and often cash to do serious investigative work, who take this seriously and who truly mean well and want to see things improve, let me say this with all sincerity: Thank you. For our differences of opinion, and method, and all in-thread bs aside, thank you for your efforts and the positive effects that you've often had.

Peace.

loki09789
9/29/2009 2:37pm,
A new bit of info as evidence of 'past practice' type trends and patterns.

I completely forgot that prior to the 2005 medical injury stuff that was Bob's reason for backing out of our sparring match/workout, that Bob's coffee meet ups with Jerome, my instructor were the by product of a series of exchanges between them that started as "Let's get together and work out" to which Bob initially agreed to, but eventually backed out of because he was having headaches of unknown origins.

In the same way that Bob was adviced not to meet me, he was adviced not to meet with Jerome for the same fear of ambush type of logic.

I am sharing this information with the permission of Jerome (my instructor). I can back this up if necessary. I'm sure Jerome would be willing to write something up if need be.

Kaith Rustaz
9/29/2009 3:15pm,
A new bit of info as evidence of 'past practice' type trends and patterns.

I completely forgot that prior to the 2005 medical injury stuff that was Bob's reason for backing out of our sparring match/workout, that Bob's coffee meet ups with Jerome, my instructor were the by product of a series of exchanges between them that started as "Let's get together and work out" to which Bob initially agreed to, but eventually backed out of because he was having headaches of unknown origins.

In the same way that Bob was adviced not to meet me, he was adviced not to meet with Jerome for the same fear of ambush type of logic.

I am sharing this information with the permission of Jerome (my instructor). I can back this up if necessary. I'm sure Jerome would be willing to write something up if need be.
Paul, say whatever you want to, post whatever edited excerpts you wish. I'm sure that the folks here will overlook being able to verify for themselves and will take your word on it all. You being honest of course, never engaged in any sock puppetry, libel, defamation of character, etc. Never made any prank calls, never did any internet stalking, and so on.

Last time I talked to Jerome about you, which was years ago I believe, he was insistent that you were training partners, not his student. But, this is your obsession, your vendetta, your reason for being. Who am I to deny you that which completes you? I'm not going to get into it with Tom, Jerome or anyone else you try to drag back in. I believe I have made peace with them and that we have moved on from our past unpleasantness.

I offered to meet you to end this never ending obsession of yours. I know it probably won't, but I have to make the attempt. You're sick Paul. Seek professional help, see a qualified psychiatrist, someone who can help you move past this fixation you have and grow up finally. Obsession is never good for the soul.

Note, I'm not disputing I was advised against meeting with Jerome. I was. I did it anyway. I'm not disputing I was advised against meeting with you. I was. Did I give you some BS reasons? Yep. Because I do not trust you. Let me repeat that. I DO NOT TRUST YOU. You're a game player, an internet warrior who goes on and on and on about fantasy in the arts, yet is as guilty of living in a dream world as Soke Calkins is. You libeled me in public. You defamed my character because you had an issue with my instructor. You were involved in numerous instances of game playing, trolling, libel and more over a long period of time against me, and several people that I do business with. You are not a trustworthy person, and any offer of "safety", or "sharing" regarding you is suspect. I have no reason to trust you, and have less now than I did a week ago. You're ONLY intent here, is to do what you can to continue a fight that I walked away from 2 years ago. So no, I don't like you, I don't trust you, and I certainly have no respect for you.

I'm not disputing anything you post. I don't have access to verify for myself, or records on hand from when they were first posted. My medical issues are legit, and no, I'm not posting my records for you to view. If you decide to post an edited image of me as the bitch in a TJ donkey show, hey, it's accurate folks. As accurate as mr. Paul Martin is honest, honorable and respectable.

I await even more "new" information.

Have your fun Paul. It seems to give your life purpose.
I'll be at Starbucks on Thurday as promised.
230pm.
Walden Ave.
Across from Target.

I have -bigger- fish to fry until then.

Kaith Rustaz
9/29/2009 3:16pm,
Isn't this about the third or fourth time you've been leaving?
What can I say, I love watching pigs play in the slop. I'll be lurking. You'll be obsessing. It's all good kid.

Condemned
9/29/2009 6:48pm,
If this is an "of the month award" does all of these fun and interesting posts come to an end when it's October in another day or so?