Ooh *makes sizzling noise*

So the crux of Happeh's arguments basically amount to "It's those goddamn Jews?" Huh.

Hey Happeh, my Muay Thai coach is Israeli... is he part of World Domination by virtue of the fact that he's Jewish and from Israel? Or is this not necessarily the case? If not, how do I go about discovering if he's in league with World Domination?

Tell him you know of a terrorist plot.

After you get back from being kidnapped and tortured for the details, let us know what your experience was like.

Tell him you know of a terrorist plot.

After you get back from being kidnapped and tortured for the details, let us know what your experience was like.OH C'MON!!
That was pathetic and you know it!!

Troll!!!

You can't possibly believe what you just wrote there!!

Deluded or not!!

Happeh or not!!

Shabby, fuckin Troll!!!

You did attribute the Baruch Levy quote, which is a nice touch, but I'd appreciate it if you'd explain exactly who Baruch Levy is, and what information you have to suggest that the article in Revue de Paris is publishing a faithful reproduction of this letter (http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/Document/CadresPage.jsp?O=NUMM-17620&I=574&J=null&M=tdm&Format=TIFF) some forty-five years after Marx's death. Also, as you can see, the article (and the letter as published in it) are in French - did you do the translation yourself?

Translation. "I am stupid and lazy. I don't want to spend my time researching Baruch Levy. I want you to go research him, present me with the research, then I am going to tell you you suck and your research sucks."



Petraeus would have to reposition at least four of his five fingers for it to resemble a mudra. If you have any theories about why he is holding his hand in the handshake position, beside it being the neutral position for his fingers, you can share them.

If you are going the "questioning reality" route, I don't want to participate. If you want to argue that red is not red, you need the nut farm, not me. His hand does not need to be repositioned.




This approach presupposes that the hand gesture is causing some effect in the hand-talker, as opposed to being the result of some cause. The latter is significantly more common in the literature I've read (see this study (http://www.webster.edu/depts/artsci/bass/faculty/mm1985.htm) about nonverbal cues in courtship), but if you do have any literature written by scientists in the manner you've indicated, I'd like to give it a read.

Wow. I drove you crazy didn't I? You can't beat me and you went insane because of it!

How could waving the hands NOT affect the body of the hand waver? Exactly how would that be possible?



You may have meant this rhetorically, but it's actually a very good question.
[quote=TheRuss]

The retard telling me I have asked a good question? You are just playing games now.

[quote=TheRuss]
The human eye is naturally drawn to motion - the mechanism is complex (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T0W-3YMWK6J-27&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=45f24c25c6808cf0b4c3f3ee86ceb1ac), but the general principle is well-understood. The judicious use of hand movement keeps the audience's eyes on the speaker (literally).

Aside from encouraging the audience to pick up on other non-verbal cues, they also serve as a non-verbal cue in their own right. As a demonstration, picture me reading that last paragraph to you out loud, with my arms extended to the side, bent at the elbow, palms-up. Now picture me reading it while pounding my right fist into the palm of my left hand at about sternum-height at the emphasis point of each sentence. The former conveys uncertainty, the latter urgency.

"But Russ", you might ask, "where are the emphasis points?"

And then you would see my own point - without being able to see my hand gestures or other nonverbal cues, you will have a lot of trouble picking out the emphasis from the text alone.

Garbage. Trash. Waste of Time.

Get a brain and learn how to use it. It is the only way to become a fully functioning human being.

Now, to grant this point extra emphasis, I've separated it from the previous post.


If I came to study kung fu under your tutelage (or alternately, under a teacher you'd approved), what kind of power, exactly, is it that would I obtain?

Depends on what you want.

Do you want to beat people physically?

Do you want to become a superior human being?

Do you want to mentally beat other people?

They are all different kinds of power.

I will have to be honest with you. You wouldn't want me to teach you to physically beat people, because what I would teach you would make you sick and crazy. You would be physically strong and could kick ass, but you would be a monster lunatic who would likely die an early death from health problems, or from the police having to come shoot you.

I would teach you that because you have been very rude to me and I would derive some pleasure from watching you brag about your power, while your brain simultaneously disintegrated. You would be so infatuated with the physical power, you would never notice your brain was disintegrating.

Poor The Russ. All you had to do was talk nice to me and I would have told you anything. Now you will always have to wonder if what I tell you is a trap to get even with you for your abuse of me.

Don't think I am trying to make fun of you; I have been in hospital due to manic depressive episodes roughly 20 times. I suffer anger and paranoia problems. I am attempting to empathise with you.

They got to you huh? Convinced you that you were the problem, and you needed to pay them money and take their drugs to be better.

I wish someone could have protected you from them. ;(

Translation. "I am stupid and lazy. I don't want to spend my time researching Baruch Levy. I want you to go research him, present me with the research, then I am going to tell you you suck and your research sucks."Yeah, right, whatever, try harder.....


If you are going the "questioning reality" route, I don't want to participate. If you want to argue that red is not red, you need the nut farm, not me. His hand does not need to be repositioned. It's pretty clear who needs the nut farm here. The fact you're not clued in, just makes it more obvious to everybody else


Wow. I drove you crazy didn't I? You can't beat me and you went insane because of it! You beat Russ??? See my above remark about judgements about who is and is not sane....


How could waving the hands NOT affect the body of the hand waver? Exactly how would that be possible?

The retard telling me I have asked a good question? You are just playing games now.........


Garbage. Trash. Waste of Time.

Get a brain and learn how to use it. It is the only way to become a fully functioning human being.Y'know, it often amazes me how often you come out with statements that accuratly apply to you, when you're directing them at others.....

Like that last quote, for example.....

Translation. "I am stupid and lazy. I don't want to spend my time researching Baruch Levy. I want you to go research him, present me with the research, then I am going to tell you you suck and your research sucks."

I found the earliest available copy of the letter he allegedly wrote.
I found several people who bear the name of Baruch Levy, (1 (http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/gov/940909143416.html), 2 (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/22/entertainment/main1431959.shtml), 3 (http://bdi.mfa.government.bg/bg/LevyCV.pdf)), all of whom were either not born at the time that letter was written, and I found this tombstone (http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=Levy&GSst=6&GRid=13607659&) on the wrong side of the Atlantic, which still doesn't tell me anything.

Do you know what the first Google hit for Baruch Levy is? This page (http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/1000quote.html).


As part of its "proof," it quotes from an alleged letter from one, Baruch Levy, to Karl Marx, the co-founder of the modern Communist movement. Nowhere in the article is there any inkling of who Baruch Levy could possibly be, excepting that he is referred to as a Neo-Messianist (whatever that is supposed to denote). The Baruch Levy "letter" outlines a Jewish plan to take over the world. Nowhere in the writings of Karl Marx is there any mention of Baruch Levy and/or his alleged letter. In fact, one can be reasonably certain Marx would have consigned it to the incinerator, if such a letter had reached him. Revue De Paris does not state where it obtained the alleged letter. The obvious reason -that it is a fraud- can easily be deduced from the internal evidence. Its leitmotif is almost identical with the central theme of the Rabbi Rabinovich fabrication (which we have already discussed) and the fraudulent Protocols of the Elders of Zion (which we will soon examine). In other words, any sane person, who has a knowledge of history, can readily recognize the Baruch Levy letter as a palpable fraud.

If you have a better theory as to who Baruch Levy was, it's incumbent on you to share it. I do not have the power to read your mind. So tell me - who is Baruch Levy?


If you are going the "questioning reality" route, I don't want to participate. If you want to argue that red is not red, you need the nut farm, not me. His hand does not need to be repositioned.

I did not say that his hand needs to be repositioned. What I said was, and I quote,


Petraeus would have to reposition at least four of his five fingers for it to resemble a mudra.

His thumb is not touching - or close to touching - his index finger, and his middle, ring, and pinky fingers are not spread. That means that he is not throwing up a mudra. All you need is to look at the picture you yourself posted. It's all right there.


Wow. I drove you crazy didn't I? You can't beat me and you went insane because of it!

Before I could go insane because I "can't beat" you, I'd need to know that we were competing. I was under the impression that we were conversing.


How could waving the hands NOT affect the body of the hand waver? Exactly how would that be possible?

I did not say that waving the hands did not affect the body of the hand waver. They clearly do - just as firing a pistol results in recoil pressing against the shooter. What I did say was, and I quote:


This approach presupposes that the hand gesture is causing some effect in the hand-talker, as opposed to being the result of some cause. The latter is significantly more common in the literature I've read

I've provided you with examples of real scientists (psychology is a soft science, but still) whose studies are looking at nonverbal cues as the result of some cause. Please show me some studies where nonverbal cues are looked at - by "scientists", as you put it - as effecting a change in the hand-talker.


Garbage. Trash. Waste of Time.

I cannot say how effectively your time here is being spent, but I am growing progressively more convinced that my time here is quite well-spent indeed.


Get a brain and learn how to use it. It is the only way to become a fully functioning human being.

How do you propose I do that?

We at the World Domination Foundation give out free brains with every membership.

Depends on what you want.

Do you want to beat people physically?

Do you want to become a superior human being?

Do you want to mentally beat other people?

They are all different kinds of power.

Do I want to beat people? No, but it would be nice to have the capacity to do so. And I like the sounds of "superior human being"...


I will have to be honest with you. You wouldn't want me to teach you to physically beat people, because what I would teach you would make you sick and crazy.

You know, you're absolutely right. There's no sense in making a sacrifice like that, even if the benefits were great.


You would be physically strong

What measurements do you typically use for physical strength?


you have been very rude to me

I apologize for any impolite behaviour on my part that has caused you harm. Please let me know how I have abused you so I can learn from my mistakes.

I suppose this leads to an interesting question. Jalon, how do you feel about therapists, psychiatrists, etc.?


They got to you huh? Convinced you that you were the problem, and you needed to pay them money and take their drugs to be better.

I wish someone could have protected you from them. ;(

I suppose that this answers my question. Is this a reflection of your own experiences with psychiatric intervention?

I would teach you that because you have been very rude to me and I would derive some pleasure from watching you brag about your power, while your brain simultaneously disintegrated. You would be so infatuated with the physical power, you would never notice your brain was disintegrating.

Poor The Russ. All you had to do was talk nice to me and I would have told you anything. Now you will always have to wonder if what I tell you is a trap to get even with you for your abuse of me.

Russ has been the nicest fucking person to you on this thread you sick fucking dingleberry!

Jesus fucking christ you are goddman loser.

I call troll and the fun is now done.

Give him is fucking martyr ban and be done with him.

Tell him you know of a terrorist plot.

After you get back from being kidnapped and tortured for the details, let us know what your experience was like.Grab my thumb... gee, you're dumb.

Poor The Russ. All you had to do was talk nice to me and I would have told you anything. Now you will always have to wonder if what I tell you is a trap to get even with you for your abuse of me.How has The Russ been abusive to you in ANY way? I agree with DannyMac's sentiments, The Russ has been nothing but cordial and polite and patient with you... in fact, he's probably the one person who's been the nicest to you in this entire thread. Seems to me like SOMEONE has a persecution complex (hint: it's you).

Honestly, how the heck do you expect anyone to to buy into your theories when you're so condescending and snot-nosed with everyone? Have you ever heard the saying "You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar?"

With reference to the "pinching" this is known in Australia as the "eelshock". I once "eelshocked" a man to demonstrate and left a bruise as big as fifty cent piece. It's a physical coercion thing (remember our talk on physical coercion?)

I spoke to my acupuncturist about Dim Mak (before you ask Happeh, Australian acupuncturists have to have a thorough knowledge of conventional medication, as well as Chinese and European herbs on top of their prodding folk with needles)

She sniggered and said "They watch too many kung fu movies"