PDA

View Full Version : Objective evaluation of Shou Shu’s multiple attacker claims








Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Fantasy Warrior
9/23/2005 12:01pm,
Some arts, notably Shou Shu Kung Fu (AKA Moore’s Karate etc) claim to be “good” against multiple attackers. I’m a natural skeptic myself.

Shifu Tiger:

i'm pretty confident i could handle 8 10 however many attack. it doesn't matter, just have alot of body bags ready with tags that say, "remains unviewable"! a shou shu blue belt is as good if not much better than any blackbelt in any other system. i'll bet good money u could take on at least 4 to 6 at the same time...... salute
Name:

Yes it is good against multiple opponents.
Mantis1997

very aggressive style very easy to learn not long on forms very practical good against multiple opponents, weapons etc....
B_Bottimore

why is it so hard for you trained martial artist to accept that in shou shu you can take on multiple oppentents(6plus or whatever) and win? you keep saying prove it, how exactly would you like us to prove to you over the web? why do you have a problem believeing that?

I’m encouraging Shou Shu’ers to demonstrate this ability in some sort of objective pressure test, perhaps at a throwdown.

How can you objectively test these claims, safely and unbiased? Suggestions please.

Ronin
9/23/2005 12:13pm,
Stupid claim.

Yrkoon9
9/23/2005 12:23pm,
Brainwashing + television/movies - experience = rude awakening.

CanucKyokushin
9/23/2005 12:24pm,
As far as I know.Every style makes these claims.


Actually I'll correct myself just a little bit.Every style out there makes thses claims and demonstrates a well planed choreographed exhibition to the parents of students or at tournaments.

And thats the problem right there.Any Sifu/Sensei/Master can't create a plausible multiple fight with the lone martial artist winning out without several members of the attacking group keeping a distance.

Ronin
9/23/2005 12:26pm,
B_Bottimore
Quote:
why is it so hard for you trained martial artist to accept that in shou shu you can take on multiple oppentents(6plus or whatever) and win? you keep saying prove it, how exactly would you like us to prove to you over the web? why do you have a problem believeing that?



"HOW EXACTLY WOULD YOU LIKE US TO PROVE IT OVER THE WEB"...


I am speechless.

Jekyll
9/23/2005 12:58pm,
How can you objectively test these claims, safely and unbiased? Suggestions please.
They've got to be untrained in martial arts haven't they?

Turn up with 3 large rugby players with gum shields. Tell them to tackle him and sit on him.

Cullion
9/23/2005 1:02pm,
Can I make a suggestion ? when the Shou Shu guys agree on a multiple opponent format where the claims can be tested, can the multiple attackers please be made up as Zombies just like in 'Thriller' ?

That would kick ass.

Thanks.

trfcrugby
9/23/2005 1:04pm,
Or three wrestlers, or three boxers...

Against three or four timid, untrained guys, I think any trained fighter will do well. But add just one guy that knows what he is doing, and it all changes.

Ronin
9/23/2005 1:29pm,
Or three wrestlers, or three boxers...

Against three or four timid, untrained guys, I think any trained fighter will do well. But add just one guy that knows what he is doing, and it all changes.

Shou shou at its highest level: :karated:

Fantasy Warrior
9/23/2005 1:42pm,
Four unarmed boxing glove wearing MMA(et al) guys has to be safer than 8 drugged up street punks who may be carrying weapons, as the claim implies. The attacker's being martial artists would hardly be a good excuse for failure, as the video would show the nature of the attack and people could judge for themselves.

Ronin
9/23/2005 1:45pm,
Four unarmed boxing glove wearing MMA(et al) guys has to be safer than 8 drugged up street punks who may be carrying weapons, as the claim implies. The attacker's being martial artists would hardly be a good excuse for failure, as the video would show the nature of the attack and people could judge for themselves.

You're wasting your time.
Never gonna happen.
Systems like this preach that crap and other **** to get the guillable.
Then they try to "prove it" with their own students tjhat aren't even TRYING to stomp a mudhole in the defender.

This is the ONLY way to deal with multiple attackers:
:new_2guns

EternalRage
9/23/2005 3:39pm,
In all fairness, I would like to point out this post which was made in response to similar inquiries I made about SHou Shuers' opinions on multiple sparring:

I will state that the opinions of multiple opponents is based on the individual student or black belt. At no time does a Shun Shifu or Shihan or Da' Shifu tell us that we can go out and beat 10 opponents at once.

and the following:

I'm now at the point where I can visualize being attacked at night by two people, and actually getting out of it alive and intact (assuming, of course, that my attacker wasn't good at takedowns or a trained fighter).
(which basically rules out MMAers, NHBers, and grapplers)

I'm willing to bet there are two different types of people in this organization. There's one side that indulges in crouching tiger hidden dragon mythologies, from students to sifus, and on the other side are those that are a bit more realistic. So basically crazy nutriders vs level headed ppl. Like someone pointed out, doesn't this exist in most systems?

Ronin
9/23/2005 3:41pm,
In all fairness, I would like to point out this post which was made in response to similar inquiries I made about SHou Shuers' opinions on multiple sparring:


and the following:

(which basically rules out MMAers, NHBers, and grapplers)

I'm willing to bet there are two different types of people in this organization. There's one side that indulges in crouching tiger hidden dragon mythologies, from students to sifus, and on the other side are those that are a bit more realistic. So basically crazy nutriders vs level headed ppl. Like someone pointed out, doesn't this exist in most systems?


Yes, these people exsit in every system, all the more reason to expose them.

EternalRage
9/23/2005 4:21pm,
Eh just seems like a waste - these people are in every system and will always be in every system as long as people have delusions of grandeur.

TrueSeeker
9/23/2005 4:26pm,
The problem here is that these people believe their own bullshit. I'd hate to think what would happen if one of them actually found themselves in such a position.

Fantasy Warrior
9/23/2005 4:27pm,
Eh just seems like a waste - these people are in every system and will always be in every system as long as people have delusions of grandeur.
Beast_master(?)'s comments neglect Da Shifu al Moore (sr)'s claims of defeating 12 (or 15? see newspaper clip in other thread) and Acria also said include ARMED attackers in her estimations.

Are you a closet Shou Shu'er or something? (cue: witch hunt)

Just because they are not the only ones to make these claims doesn't suddenly make it acceptable.