Up his ass, still amazingly connected to his head.

Which bit's which? Becasue I'm pretty sure that the mouth is normally a feature of the head, but in Phil's case...

Some other guy known as The Beast got banned for telling Phil what an Ad Honinem was. Apparantly Phil didn't like having a guy on his board that would be letting people know that Phil doesn't actually understand what those big words mean, they just make him look good.

I like who phill thinks an AH is any attack on the speaker AT ALL - an ad hom would be like Asia tells me how to apply a triangle, I say his opinion of a triangle doesn't matter because he wears pink like crockett and tubbs. . .you are doing it when you attack a person IN SPITE of their logical statement. Phil CHRONICALLY overuses the ideas of ad hom and appeal to authority - which is almost the opposite, it's when you try to reinforce the logic of a statement WITH your experience IN SPITE of your statement's lack of logic... he's very fond of explaining appeal to authority to anyone who questions his qualifications. . . not to mention both fallacies only really apply if the argument can't stand on its own - they don't come into play during debate of the argument itself.

I've yet to be banned, but then again I don't care about Phil's forum enough to even create a log in.

Apparantly I've trolled from my first post and every post since then. Phil said so, so his homies (hopefully that will piss him off, because that's not a word caucasians tend to use. He deserves it though) all agree with him.

Hmmm, let's see, my first post was politely disagreeing with Phil about charity. He said he wouldn't give to the Tsunami sufferes because they are ungrateful and charity should be always be rewarded with a "Thank you sir, when you find your cock, which has been missing for 15 years beneath the flab, can i please suck it?" i told him he was wrong and he'd misunderstood the whole situation.

Ergo I am a troll. Well, that's Ok because Phil is a fat xenophobic ************ with an eyebrow crisis.

Phil sounds like he's gone off the deep end Ashida Kim style on his forum.

I was banned yesterday and I did not even do anything. I use my account to look and I have only posted two times. The first one I asked some kind of a normal question and the second time it was on a thread about Bullshido. He was complaining about us and I said that “Phil Mania” as pretty much over on Bullshido and that we had no current threads about him. I also identified myself as a Bullshido member, and bam…banned. I was not trolling, or anything.

I did do one thing unusual. I decided that I would change my Pax user name from Olorinii to Olorin (did the same thing here a while back). Since I only have two posts, I just made a new account with the new name. I also said my location was The Thunderdome of the Internet. Phil called us that once. Moments later both accounts were inaccessible. I guess this means I am BANNED!!!

No I think he's trying to create isolationism by only letting his RBSD goons read the board, and restrict bullshido members from viewing because they're automatically evil.

Bannded here for spam posting that RBSD comic on his website because it owned.

I am not banned. I've only posted three times, and all three times were in off topic subjects. I do not plan on posting again. However, I still check PB every couple days or so almost solely because of Dan Webre. If you have not read this guy's maniacal rantings, you are cheating yourself of quality entertainment. Webre is a raving lunatic. He makes Phil look pretty normal and mundane in comparison.

You can bet that Phil goes through Bullshido's roster with a finetoothed comb everytime somebody registers with PB.

I still find it hugely entertaining that Phil calls us all names ... and yet he could still post here if he wanted to ... and none of his posts are deleted or anything ... but I for example can't post there.

Before someone posts something he doesn't like on his forum:

http://www.absoluteanime.com/sonic_x/_eggman.jpg http://altermativ.free.fr/blog/img/11Fev_robotnik.jpg

After:

http://www.blackwolf-images.com/images/dic/sonic/robotnik_106-198-r12.jpg

I like who phill thinks an AH is any attack on the speaker AT ALL - an ad hom would be like Asia tells me how to apply a triangle, I say his opinion of a triangle doesn't matter because he wears pink like crockett and tubbs. . .you are doing it when you attack a person IN SPITE of their logical statement. Phil CHRONICALLY overuses the ideas of ad hom and appeal to authority - which is almost the opposite, it's when you try to reinforce the logic of a statement WITH your experience IN SPITE of your statement's lack of logic... he's very fond of explaining appeal to authority to anyone who questions his qualifications. . . not to mention both fallacies only really apply if the argument can't stand on its own - they don't come into play during debate of the argument itself.

Objectivists do not understand philosophy. At all. In every single academic department over the world, they are universally vilified as the retarded little brothers of the philosophy world. Anyone who professes belief in Ayn Rand's little system is a chronic failure as a philosopher.

“Sorry, but this e-mail address has been banned.”

Well I have been officially banned! He banned both accounts and two of my three email addresses.

Before now, I gave Phil a little bit of the benefit of the doubt. Maybe someone did break his rules maybe they did troll…

I did none of these things! I was banned for posting on Bullshido!

I am going to write him and make him explain himself….